Key takeaways:
-
Distinguish between assistive and agentic AI: Educators must differentiate between tools that provide essential access (like transcription) and those that replace student critical thinking to avoid unfair technology bans.
-
Prioritize content-first compliance: With WCAG deadlines approaching, institutions should focus energy on auditing active course materials and clearing out inaccessible archived data.
-
Protect student autonomy and privacy: True accessibility means giving students the choice of which tools they want to use, while ensuring AI transcription does not compromise with the privacy of personal classroom discussions.
Artificial Intelligence is currently reshaping higher education, presenting both a frontier of opportunity and a complex web of compliance challenges.
Usage rates of AI tools among university students have surged to 92%, up from just 66% in 2024. Despite this near-universal adoption, only 36% of students have received formal training or support from their institution on how to use AI effectively.
For disability services professionals, the conversation has shifted from ‘if’ they should use AI to ‘how’ they can align these tools with WCAG compliance and student autonomy.
In a recent webinar hosted by Genio, we were joined by Lauren Tenney, Disability Rights Advocate and Keely Reeves, Student Development Specialist from University of Arkansas at Little Rock.
Together, they explored the tension between AI as a powerful assistive tool and its potential to inadvertently create new barriers, alongside practical ways institutions can approach WCAG compliance.
How can AI tools support students with disabilities?
For many students, AI has become a vital assistive technology. Keeley Reeves and Lauren Tenney highlighted how specific tools are helping students with disabilities:
- Real-time transcription: These tools allow students with ADHD or hearing impairments to read along with a lecture, which often helps with information processing.
- Reading assistance: AI-powered text-to-speech tools help students who struggle with traditional reading by converting digital text into natural-sounding audio.
- Personalized learning: AI can act as a tutor by helping students find synonyms, break down complex instructions, or organize their thoughts before writing.
Where does AI create new barriers for learning in higher education?
While AI offers support, it can unintentionally create obstacles if not managed carefully. The panel discussed three major concerns:
1. The loss of student autonomy
There is a fine line between a tool that assists and a tool that replaces the student's own thinking. When students rely too heavily on AI to generate answers, they may miss out on the productive friction of the actual learning process.
2. Privacy and lived experience
In interactive classrooms where students share personal stories, automated transcription creates a permanent record of private conversations. This can make students feel less safe sharing their experiences.
3. The analog pivot
To prevent students from using AI for cheating, some professors are requiring handwritten notes or paper exams. This can be a major setback for students who rely on digital tools to communicate or write.
Want to create an AI policy for your institution?
Download Genio's free AI policy template that can be used as a basis to create your own, in accordance with your institution’s own policies, protocols and applicable laws.
What steps should colleges take before the WCAG deadline?
With the April 2026 deadlines for WCAG (Web Content Accessibility Guidelines) compliance approaching, many staff members feel overwhelmed.
The experts suggest a content-first approach:
- Focus on active content: Start by making the materials you are using right now accessible (like PDFs and videos) rather than trying to fix years of archived data at once.
- Differentiate your tools: Educators should learn to distinguish between generative AI(which writes papers) and assistive AI (which provides access), rather than banning all technology.
Download Genio’s complete guide to what WCAG 2.1 Level AA is, why it matters, and what actions colleges need to take to ensure adherence to the regulations, before the April 24th 2026 deadline.
How can colleges ensure that external vendors meet accessibility standards?
Most universities rely on third-party tools within their learning management systems, making vendor compliance a critical part of accessibility efforts. Ensuring these tools meet WCAG standards requires a more intentional and structured approach.
Institutions should begin by requesting a VPAT (Voluntary Product Accessibility Template) to understand how each tool addresses accessibility requirements and where potential gaps may exist.
It’s also important to include students with disabilities in the testing process before purchasing any tool. This ensures practical usability and helps identify barriers that may not be obvious in documentation alone.
Finally, colleges must ensure that any AI tool used includes clear data privacy protections, safeguarding student information while maintaining accessibility.
What is the most important takeaway for educators?
The most impactful insight from the discussion is that AI is here to stay. Instead of ignoring it, institutions must embrace it responsibly.
"Access without autonomy is not access." - Lauren Tenney, Disability Rights Advocate
By focusing on Universal Design for Learning (UDL) and ensuring students have the choice of which tools to use, we can create an educational environment that is truly inclusive.
Missed the webinar? Catch the full replay and explore the key insights.
